Re: North Korea satellite: NOTAMs inconsistent with claimed sun-synchronous orbit

From: Brian Weeden (brian.weeden@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Apr 02 2012 - 13:36:18 UTC

  • Next message: Marco Langbroek: "SATOBS ML (4353), 1 Apr 2012 (PT II): USA 129, Nanosail Unid"

    Thanks Ted.  Looking at SMAD further, I see now why I haven't noticed it
    before.  The correction ranges from 0 degrees (for a launch due east) to 3
    degrees for polar, and I had previously used this formula for due east only.
    
    ---------
    Brian
    
    
    
    
    On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Ted Molczan <ssl3molcz@rogers.com> wrote:
    
    > Brian Weeden wrote:
    >
    > > Ted, I agree with your overall point about the projected launch Az not
    > > right for a SSO orbit at 500 km, but my math is coming out differently.
    > >  For a latitude of 39.66 and an Az of 192.3 I get an inclination of 99.44
    > > degrees.  My excel formula for the inclination is
    > >
    > > =DEGREES(ACOS(((SIN(RADIANS(B6)))*(COS(RADIANS(B5))))))
    > >
    > >
    > > where B5 = latitude and B6 = Az
    > >
    > > I think one of us may have a math error (likely me), so if someone could
    > > check my formula I would appreciate it.
    >
    > Your result is correct for the formula you are using, which is the
    > commonly used first approximation, based on the
    > inertial azimuth. I almost always use that formula, which yields an
    > azimuth of 189.7 deg for an orbit of inclination of
    > 97.42 deg, launched from latitude 39.66 deg.
    >
    > When the situation calls for greater precision, I include a correction for
    > Earth's rotation found in the textbook Space
    > Mission Analysis and Design (aka SMAD), 3d edition, pg. 154, equation
    > 6-42c. The simplest form of the correction, said
    > to be accurate to 0.1 deg for low Earth orbits, is:
    >
    > = ATAN((VL / VO) * COS (inertial azimuth)),
    >
    > Where VL = velocity of the launch site, = 465.5 * cos(latitude), m/s
    >      VO = orbital velocity, m/s
    >
    > For the case at hand, the correction adds 2.7 deg to the inertial launch
    > azimuth, resulting in 192.3 deg (including
    > round-off).
    >
    > These formulae offer plenty of potential for big errors due to confusion
    > regarding quadrants, but otherwise are pretty
    > simple to use.
    >
    > SMAD provides a more precise version of the correction formula, but the
    > above is sufficient for my purposes.
    >
    > Ted Molczan
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Seesat-l mailing list
    > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    >
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/private/seesat-l/attachments/20120402/3e6348a7/attachment.html 
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 02 2012 - 13:37:29 UTC