Re: North Korea satellite: NOTAMs inconsistent withclaimedsun-synchronous orbit

From: Bob Christy (bob@zarya.info)
Date: Sun Apr 08 2012 - 19:27:27 UTC

  • Next message: Brian Weeden: "Re: North Korea satellite: NOTAMs inconsistent withclaimedsun-synchronous orbit"

    I agree absolutely. I made a similar point a few days ago, immediately 
    after Ted's original analysis of the potential inclination (scroll down 
    to the "Trajectory" heading): 
    http://www.zarya.info/Gallimaufry/Kwangmyongsong3.php
    
    Bob Christy
    
    On 08/04/2012 19:57, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
    > ..........In the absence of an accepted international definition it's a matter of taste what the
    > tolerance should be. And for the North Koreans, if their satellite only works for
    > a couple of weeks, say, then you only care how much the local time drifts during that
    > period.
    >
    >   - in the spirit of friendly pedantic argument,
    >         Jonathan
    > _______________________________________________
    > Seesat-l mailing list
    > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    >
    >
    > -----
    > No virus found in this message.
    > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
    > Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4922 - Release Date: 04/08/12
    >
    >
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 08 2012 - 19:28:08 UTC