The next image (still going backwards) looks very convincingly like NOSS 8, though I used a 52 day old elset. Though I have no image photometry tool, the track is much brighter (but shows fading) than some other objects I have captured. I wouldn't have expected this. ObsReduce reports: Obs - Pred: 0.063 deg X-track; 97.276 s late, relative 51.90 day old elset: 18025 87 043H 5919 E 20130407220938000 18 25 1811556+315002 37 S Obs - Pred: 0.068 deg X-track; 97.240 s late, relative 51.90 day old elset: 18025 87 043H 5919 E 20130407220948000 18 25 1821327+312520 37 S 99162 13 597D 5919 E 20130407220910000 18 25 1839327+261334 37 E 99162 13 597D 5919 E 20130407220920000 18 25 1851672+283399 37 S 99159 13 597E 5919 E 20130407220732000 18 25 1848038+251248 37 S 99159 13 597E 5919 E 20130407220742000 18 25 1859079+271549 37 The three digits after 99 are part of my image catalog numbers. I have more images reduced, but the results were not saved in the ObsReduce archives, and/or had old times or wrong positions ? I will have to re-measure them : 21:56:22 137 UNID 1 descending from zeta Lyrae to HP 090637 21:56:50 138 UNID 1 21:57:18 139 UNID 1 22:01:40 148 UNID 2 could be an IGS 8 object /Björn IOD format: http://www.satobs.org/position/IODformat.html ---------------------------------------- Björn Gimle, COSPAR 5919 59.2576 N, 18.6172 E, 23 m Phone: +46 (0)8 571 43 312 Mobile: +46 (0) 704 385 486 _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 08 2013 - 20:54:27 UTC