While sifting through the electronic heap of fortune-telling and economic discussion relating to the Iridium constellation, I happened upon a minor discrepancy. No, not a discrepancy in orbital parameters or flash timings. It was instead a discrepancy of principle. In a rebuttal to a rebuttal to another rebuttal, Philip Chien defends the validity of his argument concerning the corporate future of the troubled Iridium satellites. Off topic? Probably. Yet I held no objection to seeing it posted. In truth, I read it with a certain degree of interest. But then, in a concurrently-submitted post, Mr. Chien takes John Locker to task for posting the "Lost Cosmonauts" tale. Not only is Mr. Locker sternly discouraged from posting any additional off-topic items, but he is also -- in no uncertain terms -- made aware of his gullibility and lack of education regarding the operational dynamics of artificial-satellite telemetry. (C'mon Mr. Locker -- weren't you awake while being taught wireless data communications physics in 3rd grade science class??) So...if it is appropriate for one person to engage in a continuing and irrelevant topic (irrelevant to SeeSat insofar as hypothetical Iridium scenarios are concerned), then the same privilege should be allowed to every person on this list. Now I wish to stress that I have no ill-feelings toward Philip Chien. I have a healthy respect and admiration for his expertise. And I realize that maybe he was having a bad day when he responded to John. Maybe the skies are still cloudy over his house. Maybe he was kicked out of the Delta/Globalstar launch control room on August 17. Who knows? At any rate, I offer my sincere apologies to you, fellow SeeSat'er, for cramming this in your inbox. And to the list manager I offer my solemn promise that this will be my last off-topic post. (Heck -- depending on the thrashing I get, it may just be my last post!) Robert Rodriguez Jr. Astrophysicist-in-training