Re: magnitude question Agena-D

From: Ralf Vandebergh (ralf.vandebergh@home.nl)
Date: Wed Aug 25 2010 - 07:59:42 UTC

  • Next message: Thomas Wehr: "X-37B OTV-1 - circumstances of orbit-raising of Aug 09"

    Thank you, the information is useful. I expect the Agena to be most of the
    time at
    the side of the fainter magnitudes. The observation of 1964-002-A last
    evening did
    not succeed due to strong twilight, but circumstances will improve in the
    comming weeks. But the first attempt suggest indeed a magnitude considerably
    below 4.
    
    About uncertainty of predictions of satellites in general; it was
    demonstrated nicely last night;
    ALOS was predicted at 3.0 and ERS-2 at 3.7. In reality, ERS appeared
    brighter
    then ALOS, almost reversed.
    
    Best wishes,
    Ralf
    
    
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ted Molczan" <ssl3molcz@rogers.com>
    To: <SeeSat-L@satobs.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 7:00 PM
    Subject: RE: magnitude question Agena-D
    
    
    Ralf Vandebergh wrote:
    
    > The coming days I will be hunting to capture HR images of an
    > Agena upper stage Agena D Rocket (00733 1964-002-A).
    >
    > Problem is I get 2 different magnitude-predications.
    > Calls-sky predicts mag 4.4 and Heavens Above says mag 3.7.
    > Generally it appears, the Heavens above predications are
    > considerably more positively.
    >
    > I would like to hear from earlier observations of this object
    > to get an impression which of the 2 predictions is more realistic.
    >
    > The reason that this is important for me is, that it makes a
    > lot of difference and difficulties in the settings for the used
    > imaging-setup in the case if it is fainter then mag 4.0 - 4.1.
    
    You raise an important point. I cannot comment specifically on the
    difference between those
    predictions, but it is small in relation to the inherent uncertainty.
    
    For the majority of satellites, brightness predictions have an uncertainty
    of at least 1 magnitude,
    often more.
    
    As a result of the efforts of several of our colleagues, I have in my
    archive more than 1500
    brightness observations of Agena D rocket bodies. Below is a plot of eight
    Agena D rockets in LEO,
    with magnitude normalized to 1000 km range, versus phase angle:
    
    http://satobs.org/seesat_ref/misc/Agena_D_stdmv.pdf
    
    (Note: we have more than 1000 obs of 71110B / 5679 alone - far more than of
    any of the others, so to
    avoid over-weighting its data, I used only every 20th data point.)
    
    The standard magnitude of the eight Agena D stages is 5.4 +/- 2 (1000 km, 90
    deg phase angle).
    Coefficient of phase is 0.0065 mag/deg.
    
    Included among the eight objects in the above plot, is 64002A /733, which I
    have also plotted
    separately:
    
    http://satobs.org/seesat_ref/misc/64002A_stdmv.pdf
    
    The sample is very small, but comparing both plots, 64002A occupies more or
    less the same region.
    Standard magnitude is 5.3 +/- 2 (1000 km, 90 deg phase angle); coefficient
    of phase is approximately
    zero.
    
    In your follow-up message, you wrote:
    
    > Heavens above seems to predict fainter then mag 4 for the lower passes as
    > well which is very plausible. For the favorable 86 pass this evening it
    > predicts mag 3.7 and Calsky mag 4.4)
    
    For your pass of 64002A tonight, both results yield estimated maximum
    brightness of magnitude 4.9
    +/- 2, in other words, between about 2.9 and 6.9, so it may be necessary to
    observe the object many
    times, before it cooperates with your brightness requirements.
    
    Ted Molczan
    
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 25 2010 - 08:01:49 UTC