Scott Tilley wrote: "UNID: 99111 99 999U 8049 G 20120801052444560 17 25 1643914+463727 37 S 99111 99 999U 8049 G 20120801052447640 17 25 1643070+435714 37 S 99111 99 999U 8049 G 20120801052450160 17 25 1642438+414649 37 S 99111 99 999U 8049 G 20120801052452039 17 25 1642012+401184 37 S 99111 99 999U 8049 G 20120801052454079 17 25 1641751+382733 37 S 1 99111U 99111U 12214.22560230 0.00001269 00000-0 50000-4 0 00 2 99111 98.2630 76.8034 0005068 191.6120 299.0049 15.25623028 04 "Based on a quick look for s/c in near circular orbits with their apogee and perigee between 500km and 450km respectively this appears to be SAR LUPE 1 running 6.5 minutes late based on the classified elset with epoch 12206.08967909." This is just to offer that I had an on-time observation of SAR-Lupe 1 Monday evening (31 July local/1 Aug UTC). However, SAR-Lupe 4 (32750, 08-14A) has not been seen from here in a while, and that same evening its nominal prediction was 14 minutes earlier than SAR-Lupe 1, with 208 seconds uncertainty per Quicksat. Its elements were 70 days old that evening. Ed Cannon - Austin, Texas, USA _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 02 2012 - 23:33:31 UTC