Re: Starshine-2 not seen again

From: Robert Oler (cvn65vf94@msn.com)
Date: Mon Dec 24 2001 - 17:53:03 EST

  • Next message: Tony Beresford: "Re: Starshine-2 not seen again"

    I wonder if a "balloon" wouldnt be better.  Of course one the size of Echo 
    would really be neat (particularly for my other hobby...grin) but even 1/3 
    or /14 that would be quite visible.
    
    Robert
    
    
    >From: Jonathan T Wojack <tlj18@juno.com>
    >To: SeeSat-L@blackadder.lmsal.com
    >Subject: Re: Starshine-2 not seen again
    >Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 16:13:11 -0500
    >
    > > Your frustration only emphasizes that the current project design is
    > > never
    > > going to produce enough visual observations of sufficient
    > > accuracy for air drag measurement. A matter I raised in the posting
    > > containing the observation report.
    >
    >I think that if the future spheres have a faster rotational period, then
    >more flashes will result (i.e., more observations).
    >
    >------------------------------
    >Jonathan T. Wojack                 tlj18@juno.com
    >39.706d N   75.683d W
    >http://www.angelfire.com/stars2/projectorion
    >5 hours behind UT (-5)
    >
    >________________________________________________________________
    >GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
    >Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
    >Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
    >http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
    >
    >-----------------------------------------------------------------
    >Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    >in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
    >http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    >
    
    
    
    
    Robert Oler WB5MZO Houston TX
    
    
    _________________________________________________________________
    Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 24 2001 - 17:54:03 EST