Hi All Recently I've done some reading on the Feb 9, 1913 meteor procession. The following papers (and others) will be of interest to those who follow reentries. The following paper quantifies C.A. Chant's conclusion about the meteors being of 'satellitic' in nature. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1959JRASC..53...59O The following provides much of the raw data collected by C.A. Chant the principal investigator of the day. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1913JRASC...7..145C&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf Regards, Scott On 12/28/2014 12:03 PM, PAUL MALEY via Seesat-l wrote: > I disagree with Marco. Having seen a number of reentries before, this has a classical signature. The fragmentation, dispersement in the train, lingering objects that do not disappear, and the velocity. This looks like a spacecraft reentry to me. > _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-lReceived on Sun Dec 28 2014 - 15:19:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Dec 28 2014 - 21:19:37 UTC