Re: Fw: More Debris from ET?

From: Markus Mehring (m.m@gmx.de)
Date: Fri Feb 07 2003 - 13:10:56 EST

Next message: Robert Holdsworth: "Re: Shuttle attitude MET day 3"

Previous message: Markus Mehring: "Re: Shuttle theory"
In reply to: Dave Radomski - KT0H: "Fw: More Debris from ET?"
Next in thread: Don Ledger: "Re: Fw: More Debris from ET?"
Reply: Don Ledger: "Re: Fw: More Debris from ET?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:46:28 -0700, you ("Dave Radomski - KT0H"
<kt0h@attbi.com>) wrote:

> ... also suggest that piece of foam was probably partially/fully frozen
>(? -400F or so ?)...  pretty hefty brick!

Only an issue if the ET foam would be soaked with water like a sponge
(rain, condensation, etc.), which it is designed not to do. The one thing
you want to avoid when launching a rocket is to carry unnecessary weight,
and a tank insulation soaked with water would be an extreme weight penalty.

CU!	Markus

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Robert Holdsworth: "Re: Shuttle attitude MET day 3"
Previous message: Markus Mehring: "Re: Shuttle theory"
In reply to: Dave Radomski - KT0H: "Fw: More Debris from ET?"
Next in thread: Don Ledger: "Re: Fw: More Debris from ET?"
Reply: Don Ledger: "Re: Fw: More Debris from ET?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 13:22:19 EST