agzak at optonline.net wrote: > Is there information it carries plutonium? I think we are talking > just about toxic, but not radioactive propellant. There is just a US official mentioning "hazardous" material. All else is surmise and speculation. IMO, the hydrazine possibility is by far the most probable but an RTG is just barely conceivable, kind of at the =< 1% level. In any event, if the USG is really keeping foreign governments informed about this, at some point it will probably have to say what kind of hazard it's talking about. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 03 2008 - 16:02:32 UTC