RE: one other essaim obs

From: Ted Molczan (ssl3molcz@rogers.com)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2013 - 05:41:11 UTC

  • Next message: Kevin Fetter: "RE: one other essaim obs"

    Kevin wrote:
    
    > 28496 04 049E   1775 G 20130204231157246 15 25 0907915+514499 37 S
    > 
    > So the 3 of them, using the correct id.
    > 
    > 28496 04 049E   1775 G 20130205231055019 15 25 0743345+295482 37 S
    > 28496 04 049E   1775 G 20130205231129519 15 25 0822907+424547 37 S
    > 28496 04 049E   1775 G 20130204231157246 15 25 0907915+514499 37 S
    
    Thank you for the additional point. Please note that you mistyped the date of your first two. Here is the correct data:
    
    28496 04 049E   1775 G 20130204231055019 15 25 0743345+295482 37 S
    28496 04 049E   1775 G 20130204231129519 15 25 0822907+424547 37 S
    28496 04 049E   1775 G 20130204231157246 15 25 0907915+514499 37 S
    
    Fortunately, it appears that your TLE is based on the correct dates.
    
    Now I will resume my effort to include Greg's July 2012 observations in the analysis.
    
    Ted Molczan
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 06 2013 - 05:41:42 UTC