Greg Roberts wrote: >>One possible explanation - could you have applied the 1.5 s correction >>in the wrong direction, i.e subtracted, instead of added? > >YES , Ted, I am an idiot - I did SUBTRACT so the CORRECT TIME should be >3 seconds later, ie 19h 53m 02.3s UT. Thanks for pointing it out - now I >can understand why they retire old crocks like me when they get too old! This type of error is quite common, which as a [relatively] young crock, I too have been known to make. That's life! Clear skies! Ted