>may prove not to be as accurate as stated. to the contrary... my copy of french analytical beta software (fabs) indicates that your point is within the 28 m/e stated once the cross designation is applied to conform with the general (but not necessarily correct) consensus & assuming 02022 somewhere available elset is 'reasonably correct' -- and it usually is. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 01/26/02 at 20:57 Ted Molczan wrote: >I saw both objects, still separated about 5 s in time. I obtained the >following point for the trailing object: > >26907 01 040C 2701 P 20020127003955580 17 25 1359109+642617 28 S > >I could not see the reference stars well due to moonlit haze, so this >point may prove not to be as accurate as stated. > >Site 2701: 43.68764 N, 79.39243 W, 230 m > >Ted Molczan > > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' >in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org >http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html ************************************************ Paul Gabriel 26.24306N 098.21614W GPS 35m ASL (UTC-6) gabriel305@earthlink.net God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to separate day from night; they shall serve as signs for the set times -- the days and the years; and they shall serve as lights in the expanse of the sky to shine upon the earth." And it was so... And God saw that this was good. ************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 26 2002 - 23:51:42 EST