Again, thanks to all who looked at this. From information sent to me by one of the members of this list (and who would rather not be identified), it is clear that there really is a 40% decrease in the number of daily TLEs since November and that this has happened to lesser extents before. Historically, what happens is that after a period when not all the TLEs are posted, the backlog of TLEs, which seem to have been determined all the time, are posted in one big chunk. I think we can expect the same thing to happen some time hopefully sooner rather than later. This is almost certainly what has happened to the Cluster II satellites that appear to be lost, as was noted in an earlier posting to this list. Thanks again to everyone for their help! Ive learned an interesting lesson about space-track from this. Best regards, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Geoffrey E. Forden [mailto:forden@MIT.EDU] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:05 PM To: 'Daniel Deak'; seesat-l@satobs.org Subject: RE: a general decrease in the numbers of TLEs since November? Thanks to all who looked! My friend looks at the daily TLEs (he downloads the daily file every day) and has noticed a 40% drop in its size starting in November. So while the total catalog doesnt change, the daily TLEs really do seem to have dropped. I'm in the process of trying see if there is an altitude dependence (which might allow me to see if it is the Texas radar fence that is giving a problem.) So far, this is all based on file sizes but I hope to be able to say something more quantitative soon. Best regards, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Deak [mailto:dan.deak@sympatico.ca] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 5:56 PM To: seesat-l@satobs.org Subject: RE: a general decrease in the numbers of TLEs since November? Hi, I just loaded the full satellite catalog file from Space-Track and it shows 11669 objects, a number that I've never seen really drop. The youngest elset was 0.5 day old and the oldest was at 30.3. The description on Space-Track says : These files are generated twice a day, every day and consist of the most recent elset for every object in the specified group that has received an update within the past 30 days. So there is more objects up there, but I guess the great majority of them (those that have been catalogued) are in the elset file. High altitude objects look difficult to track... Daniel Deak Webmestre, site Obsat COSPAR site 1748 : 45.8813°N, 72.5317°W, 90 m., UTC-5:00 Site en francais sur les satellites: French-language satellite web site : http://www.obsat.com -----Message d'origine----- De : Geoffrey E Forden [mailto:forden@MIT.EDU] Envoyé : 6 janvier 2009 14:36 Ā : seesat-l@satobs.org Objet : a general decrease in the numbers of TLEs since November? An analyst I respect a lot has told me that the number of cataloged TLEs posted by space-track has decreased by 40% since November (since roughly when those six satellites, including the CLUSTER II satellites, were lost). I'm only able to check a few satellites at a time and was wondering if anyone had also noticed this? Thanks! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 07 2009 - 00:41:29 UTC