I have made some blunders recently : >This rocket will decay about July 27: >Cosmos 2312 SL-6 rocket >1 23585U 95026B 95200.56962391 .00657037 80191-5 66334-3 0 1058 >2 23585 62.8103 283.7025 0125162 124.8523 236.4458 15.96379749 8778 No, this ndot2 was abnormally high, here is a current elset, indicating decay around Aug. 05: Cosmos 2312 SL-6 rocket 1 23585U 95026B 95207.19402803 +.00711479 +81645-5 +55254-3 0 01292 2 23585 062.8086 257.6711 0099708 123.9495 237.1163 16.04234074009834 >#22808 is visible, at least from Canada and >mid-northern Europe, until decay. >ndot2 has not kept a constant difference compared to the recently >decayed EORSATS, which would indicate that the orbit correction system >is working at maximum efficiency. If this were true, it would decay >within a week. It is still fighting, keeping a remarkably small fraction of ndot2 of comparable recent decaying EORSATs (.011-.019 at MM=16.16) Cosmos 2264 1 22808U 93060A 95207.19858056 +.00398078 +71843-5 +21489-3 0 03313 2 22808 064.9753 245.2855 0049788 244.3217 115.2812 16.16313823107918 My elsets for possible candidates for the Klaus/Pouplier photo should have epochs 91100 instead of 91101, and when I didn't spot that error, I tampered with them, at least the last one should have epoch 100.616 instead of 101.696 ? ========================================================= Bjorn_gimle@lector.kth.se == bjorn.gimle@duesenberg.se == == bjorn.gimle@online.dextel.se ; 59.22371 N, 18.22857 E ========================================================= ************ Sent via DN Online (Sweden) UUCP Gateway **************