Re: image of Early Ammonia Servicer

From: tony dinkel (tonydinkel47@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jul 09 2007 - 11:47:40 EDT

  • Next message: Kevin Fetter: "Re: image of Early Ammonia Servicer"

    Too bad they don't have the time/budget/upmass to include a SAFER type 
    attitude hold device to keep its broad face into its velocity vector to 
    maximize drag.  Maybe a gravity gradient boom would be more realistic.  Both 
    would add more mass, nevermind.  Just let it tumble and take what you get.
    Happy flashing hopefully!
    
    td
    
    >From: Bill T Bard <Bill_T_Bard@raytheon.com>
    >To: seesat-l@satobs.org
    >Subject: Re: image of Early Ammonia Servicer
    >Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:24:21 -0400
    >
    >Thanks. I wonder if they attached a "sail" of some sort, if that would
    >increase it's drag (and of course brightness!) enough to produce a rapid
    >descent.
    >
    >Bill Bard
    >
    >
    >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:
    >http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    >
    
    _________________________________________________________________
    http://liveearth.msn.com
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
    http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 09 2007 - 11:49:38 EDT