{Spam?} Re: reliability of detail

From: Ralf Vandebergh (ralf.vandebergh@home.nl)
Date: Wed Jul 28 2010 - 17:43:19 UTC

  • Next message: Kevin Fetter: "upcoming Ande Castor Sphere decay"

    Here is another nice example of checking reliability of detail.
    Here are 3 frames out of a seqence of the UARS spacecraft.
    (I will have some new more impressive UARS observations soon)
    
    All 3 frames are deformed by seeing piece to piece, but still show
    mainly the same detail:
    
    http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/6896/uars20090714sequence.jpg
    
    
    Ralf Vandebergh
    
    
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ralf Vandebergh" <ralf.vandebergh@home.nl>
    To: <seesat-l@satobs.org>; <internationalspacestation@yahoogroups.com>;
    <inside_ksc@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 12:24 PM
    Subject: reliability of detail
    
    
    > Reliability of detail
    >
    > This is a nice example of the way how I check the reliability of detail.
    > Comparing frames and even better, combine them into a gif animation.
    > If different frames show generally the same detail, then you can relay
    > on its reality.
    > Here is an observation of the Automated Transfer Vehicle ATV-1
    > 2 days before its deorbit. The animation illustrates that the detail
    > visible is real and no seeing artefacts:
    >
    > http://alpo-j.asahikawa-med.ac.jp/kk08/o080927a2.gif
    >
    >
    > Ralf Vandebergh
    > http://tinyurl.com/nawq2d
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Seesat-l mailing list
    > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    >
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 28 2010 - 17:43:57 UTC