{Spam?} Re: reliability of detail

Previous message: Alberto Rango: "4641 SATOBS 27 JUL 2010."
In reply to: Ralf Vandebergh: "reliability of detail"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

ralf.vandebergh@home.nl

Here is another nice example of checking reliability of detail.
Here are 3 frames out of a seqence of the UARS spacecraft.
(I will have some new more impressive UARS observations soon)

All 3 frames are deformed by seeing piece to piece, but still show
mainly the same detail:

http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/6896/uars20090714sequence.jpg

Ralf Vandebergh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ralf Vandebergh" <ralf.vandebergh@home.nl>
To: <seesat-l@satobs.org>; <internationalspacestation@yahoogroups.com>;
<inside_ksc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 12:24 PM
Subject: reliability of detail

> Reliability of detail
>
> This is a nice example of the way how I check the reliability of detail.
> Comparing frames and even better, combine them into a gif animation.
> If different frames show generally the same detail, then you can relay
> on its reality.
> Here is an observation of the Automated Transfer Vehicle ATV-1
> 2 days before its deorbit. The animation illustrates that the detail
> visible is real and no seeing artefacts:
>
> http://alpo-j.asahikawa-med.ac.jp/kk08/o080927a2.gif
>
>
> Ralf Vandebergh
> http://tinyurl.com/nawq2d
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seesat-l mailing list
> http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
>

_______________________________________________
Seesat-l mailing list
http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l