> > I am in the process of deciding upon which telescope to buy, and > > would > > like to get some feedback as to any advantages one might have in > > attempting to view satellites. I read the VSOHP on telescopic ... I too would like to justify the purchase of a telescope. I currently favour the ETX90 (or 125). I fear that the larger models, including LX200 which I have tried, have too small fields of view. The type you want depends on what you want to do: To view or videotape satellite shapes you want a small field, and accurate tracking (LX200 leap-frog with stable scope while the object passes - or jittering constant tracking?) To find objects that may be several minutes (or hours!) early or late, you need constant computerized re-pointing, for it is very difficult to memorize lots of reference positions. To be able to make more than one positional observation per pass, you need computer control so you don't lose the object while making notes, and preferably a computer recording of the (approximate) position at the time of each observation. For small and/or distant satellites you need the larger models. -- b_gimle@algonet.se (home) http://www.algonet.se/~b_gimle -- -- SeeSat-L / Visual Satellite Observer Home Page found at -- -- http://www2.satellite.eu.org/satintro.html -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 13:42:28 PDT