Re: NOAA9 vs. NOAA17

From: Robert Oler (cvn65vf94@msn.com)
Date: Sun Jun 30 2002 - 00:25:10 EDT

Next message: Russell Eberst: "Leap seconds"

Previous message: Gene Heyler: "Re: CONTOUR launch slip"
Maybe in reply to: Dale Ireland: "NOAA9 vs. NOAA17"
Next in thread: Bjorn Gimle: "Re: NOAA9 vs. NOAA17"
Reply: Bjorn Gimle: "Re: NOAA9 vs. NOAA17"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I saw this as well on the tracking program (still track all the NOAA's...) 
anyway I think that STSPLUS can figure out the distance.  Tomorrow I'll take 
a run at it.

Robert


>From: "Kevin Fetter" <kevin_fetter@hotmail.com>
>To: SeeSat-L@satobs.org
>Subject: Re: NOAA9 vs. NOAA17
>Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:56:15 +0000
>
>Here' the output from satellite tool kit, for around the times they were
>closest. At around 19:34 UTC they were are the minimum seperation.
>
>Time (UTCG)                 Radial (km)    In-Track (km)
>Cross-Track(km) Range (km)
>
>29 Jun 2002 19:35:00.00     -27.249746       -41.786117          100.284499
>    112.007182
>29 Jun 2002 19:36:00.00     -25.940390       -39.577553           87.779704
>     99.722429
>29 Jun 2002 19:37:00.00     -24.659678       -37.528531           74.937532
>     87.362028
>29 Jun 2002 19:38:00.00     -23.413961       -35.635337           61.807451
>     75.088293
>29 Jun 2002 19:39:00.00     -22.209241       -33.893461           48.439998
>     63.154180
>29 Jun 2002 19:40:00.00     -21.051127       -32.297643           34.886586
>     51.993861
>29 Jun 2002 19:41:00.00     -19.944794       -30.841925           21.199310
>     42.407899
>29 Jun 2002 19:42:00.00     -18.894948       -29.519709            7.430753
>     35.828039
>29 Jun 2002 19:43:00.00     -17.905798       -28.323820           -6.366212
>     34.108431
>29 Jun 2002 19:44:00.00     -16.981034       -27.246569          -20.138623
>     37.898485
>29 Jun 2002 19:45:00.00     -16.123809       -26.279823          -33.833620
>     45.774667
>29 Jun 2002 19:46:00.00     -15.336734       -25.415068          -47.398647
>     55.926495
>29 Jun 2002 19:47:00.00     -14.621871       -24.643488          -60.781649
>     67.197541
>29 Jun 2002 19:48:00.00     -13.980740       -23.956022          -73.931263
>     78.963180
>29 Jun 2002 19:49:00.00     -13.414328       -23.343444          -86.797013
>     90.876741
>29 Jun 2002 19:50:00.00     -12.923106       -22.796420          -99.329502
>    102.727958
>
>Kevin
>
>From: "Dale Ireland" <direland@drdale.com>
>To: "Seesat-l" <SeeSat-L@satobs.org>
>Subject: NOAA9 vs. NOAA17
>Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 17:03:59 -0700
>
>The new NOAA17 is in an orbit almost identical to NOAA9. Today they flew in
>formation and passed each other slowly around 1900UT. They are still quite
>close. I wonder if anyone's tracking program can tell the minimum
>separation.
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
>in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
>http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
>




Robert Oler WB5MZO Houston TX


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Russell Eberst: "Leap seconds"
Previous message: Gene Heyler: "Re: CONTOUR launch slip"
Maybe in reply to: Dale Ireland: "NOAA9 vs. NOAA17"
Next in thread: Bjorn Gimle: "Re: NOAA9 vs. NOAA17"
Reply: Bjorn Gimle: "Re: NOAA9 vs. NOAA17"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 30 2002 - 00:33:24 EDT