Greg Roberts posted: >I wonder if Eds/Brads object in vicinity of AMS 1 is not possibly XSS11 >which is lost at the moment? The RA of ascending node for XSS 11 could not possibly have changed enough to match AMS 1. Mike McCants ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 23 2007 - 13:55:15 EDT