Re: J002E3 imaged -- 5 minutes late

From: Rick Baldridge (rickbaldridge@msn.com)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2003 - 23:55:30 EST

  • Next message: Jari: "Grace Flares"

    George Roberts wrote:
    > I think you made a calculation error.  It looks like you stacked 4
    pictures
    > togeter, right?
    
    I should have been more clear -- you guys are just too sharp!
    
    The picture was not stacked -- it was a composite, meaning I actually
    stacked them to get the proper registration between frames, but then I cut
    out closely around each J002E3 image overlayed that at 100% opacity to the
    1st image.  So the relative brightnesses are held approximately correct.
    
    I didn't state this in the e-mail, but we did visually see the object
    through the 16" scope at over 350x.  Previous experience has shown this
    scope to go to 16.5 to 16.7 mag on nights of similar transperancy.  Not real
    scientific, but a good guesstimate.  I did not have time to check "Selected
    Areas" (SAs) for a firm magnitude fix.
    
    Hope you all enoyed the image.
    
    Rick Baldridge
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe from SeeSat-L, send a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@satobs.org
    List archived at http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 30 2003 - 23:59:46 EST