I finally received day 15075 elsets today. The Centaur is in enough of a different orbit (mean motion) that it was never seen in my previous sightings of these satellites. I decided to observe the satellites a short arc further along in their orbit to increase the observing time in an effort to get a better magnitude. Imagine my surprise when the first spacecraft (MMS 1) came into view with a specular flash. Initially I thought that it was an optical anomaly but that was discounted as the flashes repeated. I simply counted the flash interval in my mind and it was roughly 3.5 seconds. I used the stopwatch for the next three spacecraft and the flash interval is closer to actual as shown below: MMS 1 ~3.5 seconds (least accurate) MMS 2 2.5 seconds MMS 3 2.5 seconds MMS 4 3.0 seconds There may have been secondary flashing at much lower intensity but that is not confirmed. Magnitude of the flashes is about six but that has some uncertainty. The center right ascension and declination of the observing field is RA 11 hours, 16.3 minutes, Dec +12 deg, 43.5 min (J2000). This is a few degrees below Theta Leonis. The two brighter stars in the field of view were HD97937 and HD97938 and close to M65 and M66. Time of passing through the center of the field of view is shown below and is within a few seconds. All times are UTC on 17 March 2015 MMS 1 2:45:22 UTC MMS 2 2:48:35 UTC MMS 3 2:50:17 UTC MMS 4 2:51:59 UTC Observing location: Falcon, CO USA Lat= 38.9478 North Long= -104.5614 (104.5614 West) Alt= 2073 meters MMS magnitude when not flashing sometimes was 11 or less but on average was closer to 10. Based upon that, I will lower my previous standard magnitude of 6 to 6.5. I have no way to determine how to predict future flashing other than to look in the same RA/Dec. Perhaps someone can use this information to predict future flashes which may be observable in binoculars. As for the timing, a MMS press kit states that they rotate at three revolutions per minute. That is one revolution every 20 seconds. There are eight solar panels (typically reflective)so 20 seconds divided by eight equals 2.5 seconds between flashes. It looks like my times for MMS 2 and 3 are good. MMS 1 flash timing was ballpark anyway. I will have to recheck the stopwatch on MMS 4 to see if I made a mistake on it. Observations made with an 8 inch Celestron telescope. Press kit link below: www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/MMS_PressKit.pdf Ron Lee _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-lReceived on Mon Mar 16 2015 - 23:06:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Mar 17 2015 - 04:06:23 UTC