Bart, I have read your comments about the format of my reports. I hope you will forgive my use of the existing format, while I consider how to respond to your comments. These two OBS of C* 2315 r seem to form a progression with the previous two: Subtract 8.33s 1 19 49.73 1 19 41.40 1 20 2.23 1 19 53.90 12.50 1 20 14.73 1 20 6.40 12.50 1 20 27.89 1 20 19.56 13.16 1 20 41.20 1 20 32.87 13.31 1 20 54.51 1 20 46.18 13.31 1 21 7.63 1 20 59.30 13.12 1 21 21.27 1 21 12.94 13.64 1 21 35.04 1 21 26.71 13.77 1 21 48.89 1 21 40.56 13.85 1 22 1.63 1 21 53.30 12.74 1 22 14.79 1 22 6.46 13.16 1 22 27.12 1 22 18.79 12.33 1 22 40.53 1 22 32.20 13.41 1 22 54.23 1 22 45.90 13.70 1 23 7.26 1 22 58.93 13.03 1 23 20.51 1 23 12.18 13.25 1 23 33.59 1 23 25.26 13.08 1 23 47.41 1 23 39.08 13.82 1 24 1.47 1 23 53.14 14.06 1 24 13.34 1 24 5.01 11.87 1 24 27.27 1 24 18.94 13.93 1 24 39.85 1 24 31.52 12.58 1 24 52.85 1 24 44.52 13.00 1 25 6.25 1 24 57.92 13.40 1 25 18.82 1 25 10.49 12.57 Total 329.09 / 25 = 13.16 96 4 Year and month (2I5) 41.3735 -81.8637 256. lat, long, hgt (3F10.0) 21 1 19 41.40 25 Start day,hr,mn,sec nbr timings 0.00 0 12.50 1 25.00 2 38.16 3 51.47 4 64.78 5 77.90 6 91.54 7 105.31 8 119.16 9 131.90 10 145.06 11 157.39 12 170.80 13 184.50 14 197.53 15 210.78 16 223.86 17 237.68 18 251.74 19 263.61 20 277.54 21 290.12 22 303.12 23 316.52 24 329.09 25 C* 2315 r 7.4 2.4 0.0 5.5 1 23604U 95032 B 96116.12775655 .00000008 00000-0 85000-5 0 1050 2 23604 82.9044 138.7760 0026584 161.4760 198.7371 13.73606091 40495 I supply a conventional report for PPAS, recognizing that that is normal behavior for such an OBS as this. However, it was not quite as free of unusual events as the timimgs might imply. If you see analytic support for a synodic anomaly around 1h24m, I would be quite comfortable with such a conclusion. But if not, I would readily accept that no such behavior was seen. The next OBS, in contrast, seems to be a very typical, normal OBS. Subtract 5.52s 1 49 45.67 1 49 40.15 1 49 58.50 1 49 52.98 12.83 1 50 11.62 1 50 6.10 13.12 1 50 25.04 1 50 19.52 13.42 1 50 38.25 1 50 32.73 13.21 1 50 51.60 1 50 46.08 13.35 1 51 5.53 1 51 0.01 13.93 1 51 18.92 1 51 13.40 13.39 1 51 31.60 1 51 26.08 12.68 1 51 45.67 1 51 40.15 14.07 1 52 0.07 1 51 54.55 14.40 Total 134.40 / 10 = 13.44 96 4 Year and month (2I5) 41.3735 -81.8637 256. lat, long, hgt (3F10.0) 22 1 49 40.15 10 Start day,hr,mn,sec nbr timings 0.00 0 12.83 1 25.95 2 39.37 3 52.58 4 65.93 5 79.86 6 93.25 7 105.93 8 120.00 9 134.40 10 C* 2315 r 7.4 2.4 0.0 5.5 1 23604U 95032 B 96116.12775655 .00000008 00000-0 85000-5 0 1050 2 23604 82.9044 138.7760 0026584 161.4760 198.7371 13.73606091 40495 PPAS: Walter I. Nissen, Jr., CDP, dk058@cleveland.freenet.edu, 55 Barrett RD #808, Berea, OH 44017-1657, USA, 216-243-4980, -81d 51.823', 41d 22.413', 256m, 7x35 95- 8 B 96-04-18 1:14:11.6 WN 211.6 3. 6 35.3 M'M', C*2306r, mag 3or4 Probing my 1000 elset file of bright objects, I find no candidate for the UnID I saw while timing C* 2315 r, except for C* 2219, the motion of which fits beautifully. So I feel I have no alternative but to provide this rather ludicrous report: 92- 76 A 96-04-18 1:39 WN 12. 5. 1 12. A'A', (UnID, C* 2219?) If this one wasn't C* 2219, then it had a very similar motion. 88- 53 B 96-04-18 2:30:41.7 WN 19.1 1. 1 19. A'A', C* 1954 r, mag 4? 95- 32 B 96-04-21 1:19:41.4 WN 329.1 .5 25 13.16 A'A', C* 2315 r The shape of each maximum was a slow rise, followed by a sharp peak, followed by a rapid decline. By the end of the OBS, the As were almost sharp enough to be Fs. 95- 12 B 96-04-21 2:10:26.4 WN 128.6 5. 2 64. M'M', C* 2310 r, 5?->6? 95- 32 B 96-04-22 1:49:40.2 WN 134.4 .8 10 13.44 A'A', C* 2315 r Everyone, > 95- 32 B 96-04-18 1:38:45.2 WN 234.3 1.5 18 13.02 A'A', C* 2315 r (??) > 95- 32 B 96-04-18 1:38:45.2 WN 155.7 1.5 12 12.98 A'A', C* 2315 r (??) > 95- 32 B 96-04-18 1:41:35.6 WN 63.9 1. 5 12.8 A'A', C* 2315 r (??) > I really don't know what to submit for PPAS. Any suggestions? This question has drawn no response. I am still particularly interested in seeing reports about the flashing behavior of: C* 1908 6.0 2.0 0.0 5.9 1 18748U 88001 A 96116.07691467 .00000235 00000-0 27679-4 0 3616 2 18748 82.5075 297.5497 0021254 48.0276 312.2740 14.84735833448619 C* 2219 6.0 2.0 0.0 5.9 1 22219U 92076 A 96116.14447426 .00000137 00000-0 10000-3 0 597 2 22219 71.0255 120.2104 0009922 320.3082 39.7303 14.12290105177182 C* 2221 6.0 2.0 0.0 5.9 1 22236U 92080 A 96102.16937139 .00000088 00000-0 10000-4 0 9868 2 22236 82.5132 93.5670 0019945 228.9172 131.0312 14.73942297181769 C* 2315 r 7.4 2.4 0.0 5.5 1 23604U 95032 B 96116.12775655 .00000008 00000-0 85000-5 0 1050 2 23604 82.9044 138.7760 0026584 161.4760 198.7371 13.73606091 40495 Bjorn, Do you, or does anyone, believe the drag factors in these elsets? Cosmos 2221 6.0 2.0 0.0 5.9 1 22236U 92080 A 96109.09381685 .00001449 00000-0 22019-3 0 9736 2 22236 82.5136 87.1715 0020362 205.2032 154.8033 14.73962359182787 Cosmos 2221 6.0 2.0 0.0 5.9 1 22236U 92080 A 96116.01825458 .00820039 00000-0 11673 0 0 9764 2 22236 82.5168 80.7761 0021441 182.3066 177.7790 14.74049108183800 Cheers. Walter Nissen dk058@cleveland.freenet.edu --- Did you see the evening star?