Fw: And I thought if Nanosail D was obseved flashing, means it's rotating

From: Ralf Vandebergh (ralf.vandebergh@home.nl)
Date: Fri May 27 2011 - 21:39:02 UTC

  • Next message: Ralf Vandebergh: "Re: And I thought if Nanosail D was obseved flashing, means it's rotating"

    -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- 
    From: Ralf Vandebergh
    Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 11:38 PM
    To: paulgrace@lookoutranch.com
    Subject: Re: And I thought if Nanosail D was obseved flashing,means it's 
    rotating
    
    Yes, this is pretty insane, it is not allowed to link to my own website ,but
    this is allowed.
    
    Ralf
    
    -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- 
    From: Paul Grace
    Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 10:45 PM
    To: SeeSat-L@satobs.org
    Subject: RE: And I thought if Nanosail D was obseved flashing,means it's
    rotating
    
    This message contains a link to a web page containing images that do not
    comply with the rules for these images.  Why is this email acceptable, while
    similar emails are not?
    
    I'm puzzled by the new rules.
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: seesat-l-bounces+paulgrace=lookoutranch.com@satobs.org
    [mailto:seesat-l-bounces+paulgrace=lookoutranch.com@satobs.org] On Behalf Of
    Thierry Legault
    Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 13:37
    To: SeeSat-L@satobs.org
    Subject: Re: And I thought if Nanosail D was obseved flashing, means it's
    rotating
    
    Ted, I fully agree with you about the importance of the rule.
    
    Instead of making a long e-mail, I have made a page describing a deep
    technical analysis of recent Nanosail images from Mr Vandebergh. As
    you suspect, shape and colors are artifacts. I think that the new
    rule is especially interesting in this "textbook case". I even think
    that now a few raw images extracted from the video are not
    sufficient, the full avi file would be very interesting to assess.
    
    The analysis: http://legault.perso.sfr.fr/nanosail_vandebergh_analysis.html
    
    regards
    
    >From: Ted Molczan
    >Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 2:52 PM
    >To: seesat-l@satobs.org
    >Subject: RE: And I thought if Nanosail D was obseved flashing,means it's
    >rotating
    >
    >Ralf Vandebergh wrote:
    >
    > > Just wanted to link to my website to show an image to support this
    > > discussion, but even that is rejected.
    > > So It's even not possible to support a discussion by showing an image.
    >
    >When you comply with the rules, your images will be allowed:
    >
    >http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html#Rules
    >
    >In the rejected report, you claimed to have resolved the "the shape and
    >attitude of the Sail and perhaps a sign of
    >tumbling". Given the size and altitude of the object, the aperture of your
    >optics, and method of tracking, there is room
    >for doubt. The rules are intended to facilitate evaluation of your results.
    >
    >Ted Molczan
    >
    >
    >
    >_______________________________________________
    >Seesat-l mailing list
    >http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    
    Thierry Legault
    www.astrophoto.fr
    
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l 
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 27 2011 - 23:08:02 UTC