Thierry is allowed to reference images that Ralf is not allowed to reference, in a discussion regarding rotation of a satellite. The discussion was not a satellite observation report. I cannot find in the list a rule that supports your position Markus. I think it's pretty clear what is happening in this case, and it's not science, that's for sure. -----Original Message----- From: seesat-l-bounces+paulgrace=lookoutranch.com@satobs.org [mailto:seesat-l-bounces+paulgrace=lookoutranch.com@satobs.org] On Behalf Of Markus Mehring Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 08:37 To: SeeSat-L@satobs.org Subject: Re: And I thought if Nanosail D was obseved flashing, means it's rotating On Sat, 28 May 2011 07:28:21 -0700, you ("Paul Grace" <paulgrace@lookoutranch.com>) wrote: >I don't follow, Markus. Thierry's message obviously concerns the reporting >of hires satellite images. (It doesn't discuss anything else, actually) Well I'm sorry, but I'm afraid don't see what's not to follow there. The new rule requirements establish a reporting standard for hires observations, just like e.g. reporting points of an orbit or flash periods of an object have standardized formats (also including secondary parameters such as seeing conditions that allow a conclusion regarding reliability and accuracy of the observation). But Thierry didn't report any observations, he pointed to an analysis he made of someone else's observations. _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 28 2011 - 15:58:29 UTC