Re: Posting guidelines

Bart De Pontieu ((no email))
Tue, 24 Nov 1998 18:22:56 -0800 (PST)

On Tue, 24 Nov 1998, Allen Thomson wrote:

>     Since here in the USA it's in fashion to ask, " how do you define
> [word],"  let me ask how you define "VISUAL."   Is it just eyeball plus
> classical reflective/ refractive optics?  Do CCDs and image intensifiers
> count?  How about near-mid-thermal infrared observations with commercially
> available cameras?

With visual I mean observations/detection/tracking in the visual
wavelength range, i.e. roughly 200 nm to 1000 nm. CCD's, telescopic, it's
all on-topic, as long as the observed photons are in the visual wavelength
range. Neighboring wavelength bands (such as IR) are marginally on-topic.
The further one goes away from that band, the more off-topic it becomes.

Yes, I'm aware there is no 'logical basis' for excluding other
wavelengths. However, this is what SeeSat-L was founded for and with which
most subscribers are satisfied. The usenet-group voted on in Spring has a
charter that is also very restrictive (no radio observing) and got
overwhelming support.

As this meta-discussion is off-topic, I would ask everyone not to reply
to this message, instead reply on (to
subscribe send a message with the word "subscribe" in the SUBJECT to which was started for exactly
this type of discussion

     Bart, SeeSat-L administrator,