Phobos-Grunt: ... manoeuvring, venting, active attitude control

From: Paul Salanitri (paul.salanitri@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Nov 14 2011 - 23:33:51 UTC

  • Next message: Derek C Breit: "The NOSS 3-5 Pair"

    More Analysis:
    
    Phobos-Grunt & 2nd stage Zenit contrasting delta apsides
    http://twitpic.com/7ea8iv/full http://twitpic.com/7ea8ne/full
    
    The graphs show the difference for apogee, perigee, mean from the most
    recent measures.
    
    Looking at the mean (semi-major axis):
    
    The second stage is decaying smoothly, as expected, especially if rotation
    is sufficient to present a nice average over an orbit (I saw myself very
    early on significant light fluctuation to indicate a decent rotation rate).
    
    The spacecraft itself has a mean anomaly :-)
    
    It appears to fluctuate from around an expected ~0.3 * second stage decay
    rate, including actually gain height.  A reduced decay rate in line with
    orientation might be expected, but not an increase.  Note, I am not looking
    at the TLE decay value, but the actual osculating perigee/apogee values.
    
    When the decay rate returns to the expected value, it does it from that
    point, so it is not a correction to the TLE.
    
    Note, the first of these commenced 2011-11-10 20:00UT and appeared to stop
    2011-11-12 20:00UT.  It now appears the same thing happening again
    commencing ~ 2011-11-14 02:00UT.
    
    I believe it fits with the space craft being under autonomous active
    attitude control (with thrusters).  This also fits with the recent (and
    very slim) information that is being reported by ROSCOSMOS which is :
    'Everything is operating, except we can't talk to it, yet...'
    
    Also, if the spacecraft is under autonomous control, and without knowing
    the details of how it operates, and for how long it can operate, it would
    be hard to make decay predictions.  For example, the changes over 5 days
    resulted in a delay of 1 day in decay (also a slight lifting of the perigee
    which will reduce drag further).
    
    Using a Numerical Orbital Program, and matching the As*Cd values to the
    observed "base" decay rates:
    (The values that match that I'm using are : Zenit (len)10.4x(diam)3.9m
    cd=0.560, Ph-G (len)4.5x(diam)4.5m cd=0.400)
    
    The (expected) decay of Zenit 2nd stage (4km/day mean base rate) appears to
    be roughly in the range 24-Nov-2011 to 27-Nov-2011
    
    The (unwanted) decay of Phobos-Grunt spacecraft (1km/day mean base rate)
    without any forces acting on it (no active attitude control) appears to be
    roughly in the range 29-Dec-2011 to 8-Jan-2012. Add 2 weeks with "attitude
    control" (or whatever) at its current rate/influence.
    
    And for the rubberiest figures of all: I'm putting the current odds of
    gaining communication at about 4 to 1 (against), and mission salvage at
    about 8 to 1 (against).  That is, I'm hopeful.
    
    For observations, here is a world visibility guide to see who is close to a
    visible pass http://twitpic.com/7eavsk/full
    
    Paul Salanitri
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/private/seesat-l/attachments/20111115/49bae40b/attachment.html 
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 14 2011 - 23:35:14 UTC