Re: Starlink missing #s

From: Leo Barhorst via Seesat-l <seesat-l_at_satobs.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:24:07 +0100
The first batch of Starlinks launched in May are #21 to #81 with #47
missing.

For the recent launch one of the retaining rods is 19 074AJ in the mids of
the satellites.
The other 3 are at the end of the sequence. All 4 have a mean motion of
15.97 revs/day.

Regards
Leo

Op za 16 nov. 2019 om 01:21 schreef JRespler_at_superlink.net JAY RESPLER via
Seesat-l <seesat-l_at_satobs.org>:

> Even if 2 are dead, there are still 60 payloads listed.
> Could the # be a serial # that was never loaded in the first place?
>
> Jay Respler
> JRespler_at_superlink.net
> Monroe Township, New Jersey
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George Herbert" <george.herbert_at_gmail.com>
> To: "JAY RESPLER" <JRespler_at_superlink.net>
> Cc: seesat-l_at_satobs.org
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 6:26:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Starlink missing #s
>
> SpaceX indicated one or two of the stacked birds were testing weirdly and
> might be dead on arrival.  Destacking would have been uneconomical.
>
> -George
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Nov 15, 2019, at 1:40 PM, JAY RESPLER via Seesat-l <
> seesat-l_at_satobs.org> wrote:
> >
> > Why are STARLINK 1018 and STARLINK 1066 missing from the sequence?
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Jay Respler
> > JRespler_at_superlink.net
> > Monroe Township, New Jersey
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seesat-l mailing list
> > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
> _______________________________________________
> Seesat-l mailing list
> http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
>
_______________________________________________
Seesat-l mailing list
http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
Received on Sat Nov 16 2019 - 00:25:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Nov 16 2019 - 06:25:14 UTC