Re: Starlink missing #s

From: Leo Barhorst via Seesat-l <seesat-l_at_satobs.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 08:52:17 +0100
Just saw that on Space-Track. They renamed BN to debris.
And AJ has a very recent TLE.
Perhaps it doesn't react on commands.

Leo



Op za 16 nov. 2019 om 07:53 schreef JAY RESPLER <JRespler_at_superlink.net>:

> There are *4* deb at the end and all have MM about 15.97.
> #1040 also has MM 15.97 but if there are only 4 retainers,  then AJ is
> actually a payload.
> Observations should clarify.
>
> Still don't know why 1018 and 1066 were skipped in the naming sequence.
>
> STARLINK 1040
> 1 44745U 19074AJ  19319.91667824  .00272494  41061-4  60852-3 0  9999
> 2 44745  53.0054 149.4714 0009043 346.4734 255.0208 15.97287357   691
>
> FALCON 9 DEB
> 1 44773U 19074BN  19318.56166920  .00093141  14706-4  22018-3 0  9999
> 2 44773  53.0036 156.4517 0009121 325.6645  34.3792 15.96690871   478
> 0 FALCON 9 DEB
> 1 44774U 19074BP  19319.87528215  .00089950  14513-4  20659-3 0  9992
> 2 44774  53.0039 149.6804 0010657 341.2438  18.8195 15.97207209   682
> 0 FALCON 9 DEB
> 1 44775U 19074BQ  19318.80989467  .00092547  14747-4  20563-3 0  9994
> 2 44775  53.0044 155.1532 0006830 353.5553   6.5386 15.97850230   517
> 0 FALCON 9 DEB
> 1 44776U 19074BR  19319.55962422  .00098653  15251-4  21230-3 0  9997
> 2 44776  53.0045 151.2800 0009318   5.4777 354.6351 15.98340531   630
>
> --
> Jay ResplerJRespler_at_superlink.net
> Monroe Township, New Jersey
>
> On 11/16/19 1:24 AM, Leo Barhorst wrote:
>
>
> For the recent launch one of the retaining rods is 19 074AJ in the mids of
> the satellites.
> The other 3 are at the end of the sequence. All 4 have a mean motion of
> 15.97 revs/day.
>
> Regards
> Leo
>
> Op za 16 nov. 2019 om 01:21 schreef JRespler_at_superlink.net JAY RESPLER
> via Seesat-l <seesat-l_at_satobs.org>:
>
>> Even if 2 are dead, there are still 60 payloads listed.
>> Could the # be a serial # that was never loaded in the first place?
>>
>> Jay Respler
>> JRespler_at_superlink.net
>> Monroe Township, New Jersey
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "George Herbert" <george.herbert_at_gmail.com>
>> To: "JAY RESPLER" <JRespler_at_superlink.net>
>> Cc: seesat-l_at_satobs.org
>> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 6:26:08 PM
>> Subject: Re: Starlink missing #s
>>
>> SpaceX indicated one or two of the stacked birds were testing weirdly and
>> might be dead on arrival.  Destacking would have been uneconomical.
>>
>> -George
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Nov 15, 2019, at 1:40 PM, JAY RESPLER via Seesat-l <
>> seesat-l_at_satobs.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Why are STARLINK 1018 and STARLINK 1066 missing from the sequence?
>> >
>> > --
>> > --
>> > Jay Respler
>> > JRespler_at_superlink.net
>> > Monroe Township, New Jersey
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Seesat-l mailing list
>> > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
>> _______________________________________________
>> Seesat-l mailing list
>> http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Seesat-l mailing list
http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
Received on Sat Nov 16 2019 - 01:53:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Nov 16 2019 - 07:53:16 UTC