Re: Texas Object

From: Alan Pickup (alan@wingar.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sat Oct 14 2000 - 14:10:26 PDT

  • Next message: Harro.Zimmer: "Re: Space Debris over Oklahoma ?"

    Ron Lee <ronlee@pcisys.net> writes
    >http://www.ktxs.com/
    
    The report has a photo and indicates a time of 19:15 local time,
    presumably 00:15 UTC on the 14th, and says the direction was W->E and
    the duration 45 seconds.
    
    The earlier report by Bill Davis suggests that it was seen from Oklahoma
    and Kansas.
    
    I speculate that this was the decay of an object from the Proton launch
    of three Glonass satellites a few hours before. OIG still lists the
    objects as "UNK", but I expect they will eventually be called Cosmos
    2374/5/6. I calculate that the orbital plane of this launch was over
    Abilene, Texas, at about 00:13 UTC on a track that would carry any
    object moving in the plane in a NE to NNE direction towards Oklahoma and
    Kansas. This direction of motion does not square with the KTXS's W->E
    report, but it does link nicely with Bill's report.
    
    Two decaying objects were catalogued from this launch, and these are the
    only elsets published for them so far...
    
    C 2374? Proton platform                          222 x 61 km
    1 26567U 0063E    00287.83021579 -.00002476  78281-5  00000-0 0    12
    2 26567  64.8447 270.0186 0123550 338.2240  21.4862 16.49218953    04
    
    C 2374? Proton r                                 154 x 142 km
    1 26568U 00063D   00287.76934050 -.00002461  77806-5  00000-0 0    18
    2 26568  64.8377 270.1735 0009609 260.3878  99.6226 16.46681843    08
    C 2374? Proton r                                 154 x 142 km
    1 26568U 00063E   00288.31593574  .00085130  77824-5  16382-5 0    21
    2 26568  64.8375 268.0381 0009565 259.5957 100.5192 16.46782262    98
    
    Note that the only elset issued for the "platform" has it designated as
    "E", though it has subsequently been re-designated in OIG's on-line
    catalogue as "D", with the rocket taking the designation "E". Even so,
    it would be normal for the rocket to have the earlier designation.
    
    With no further elsets to hand, it is possible, if not probable, that
    both objects have already decayed. Note, though, that the second elset
    for the rocket has an epoch of 00288.3159, corresponding to a time of
    07:35 UTC on the 14th, more than seven hours after the fireball report.
    Provided that SpaceCom has not confused the rocket and the platform,
    this suggests that only the latter could be a candidate for the Texas
    event. I don't have a great deal of confidence in the platform's sole
    elset, but modifying its drag term to force a decay on the orbit over
    Texas produces a pass 3 degrees to the W of Abilene at ~00:24.
    
    Do we have any better time and direction estimates?
    
    
    Alan
    -- 
    Alan Pickup / COSPAR 2707:  55d53m48.7s N   3d11m51.2s W      156m asl
    Edinburgh  / SatEvo & elsets:    http://www.wingar.demon.co.uk/satevo/
    Scotland  / Decay Watch: http://www.wingar.demon.co.uk/satevo/dkwatch/
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
    http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 14 2000 - 14:12:39 PDT