Ed Cannon wrote: > It has come to my attention that among the programs being used for > predictions, there are some significantly differing results for > at least some objects. A specific case is ETS 6 (94-56A, 23230). > > Orbitron and Heavensat gave predictions that were something like > one hour of RA different from what Highfly predicted, which is > certainly enough to cause an observer to miss an observation. > I've never used the first two programs but, with all due respect > to all the programmers and program users, if there's a significant > difference from what Highfly predicts, I believe Highfly. > > My point is that perhaps people who are qualified to do so might > compare the program predictions against observations and/or also > the prediction models used, in order to determine what is the > origin of such significant differences in predictions and which > predictions are most accurate. > I've not run A/B comparisons of satellite prediction software like this - I use Rob Matson's Skymap 6.6 and I'm happy with it, though I also run Orbitron for ground tracks. Could the difference result from the Orbitron and Heavensat using the SGP4 algorithm, and Highfly using the SDP4 algorithm? That may account for the significant difference in predictions. This is an area I think we would all be interested in. Perhaps someone might try running some benchmarking tests, as Ed suggests? I'll have a go running some predictions of classified objects using both my programs to see what happens. Bruce MacDonald COSPAR Site 2751 Devizes, Wiltshire, United Kingdom 51.3440 N 1.9849 W 125M (WGS 84) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 30 2006 - 16:15:40 EST