RE: Updated elements

From: Derek C Breit (breit_ideas@poyntsource.com)
Date: Mon Sep 13 2010 - 01:28:27 UTC

  • Next message: Ted Molczan: "RE: Updated elements"

    So is this the current elset???
    
    Derek
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: seesat-l-bounces+breit_ideas=poyntsource.com@satobs.org
    [mailto:seesat-l-bounces+breit_ideas=poyntsource.com@satobs.org] On Behalf
    Of Ted Molczan
    Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 7:12 AM
    To: SeeSat-L@satobs.org
    Subject: Updated elements
    
    
    Scott Campbell, Tom Laskowski, Tim Luton, Mike McCants, Jim Nix, Alberto
    Rango, Greg Roberts, Peter Wakelin, Brad Young, and I, contributed
    observations used to determine one or more of the following element sets.
    
    OTV-1                                                    435 X 442 km
    1 36514U 10015A   10255.05642218 -.00000424  00000-0 -92303-5 0    04
    2 36514  39.9844 205.7107 0004851 175.1614 184.9242 15.43374452    01
    Arc 20100907.08-0911.81 WRMS resid 0.019 totl 0.012 xtrk
    
    My 70007 and 70008 estimates of AEHF 1 were too low in mean motion; Mike and
    Scott posted a solution that proved close, enabling new observations by
    Peter and Scott. The following is a refinement, taking advantage of those
    observations:
    
    AEHF 1                                                2222 X 49975 km
    1 36868U 10039A   10255.17347407  .00000000  00000-0  00000-0 0    03
    2 36868  18.2363 302.6261 7351931 193.3666  62.1763  1.48360888    00
    Arc 20100911.09-0912.17 WRMS resid 0.010 totl 0.005 xtrk
    
    Tim Luton's observations of Sep 11 appear to be of a different object,
    probably an UNID GTO; perhaps one of those spotted recently by Greg and
    Kevin. I may have more on that later, after some analysis.
    
    In the press briefing of Aug 30, the USAF stated that Segment 2 would more
    than double the perigee height achieved in Segment 1. As of yesterday, that
    has been accomplished, but I am uncertain whether Segment 2 is complete.
    Based on the assumption that the failed LAE (liquid apogee engine) has
    performance typical of its type, I estimate that the REA (reaction engine
    assembly) may be able to achieve the 6 deg inclination intended to have been
    achieved by the LAE, with the present perigee. If so, then we can expect
    additional REA burns that primarily decrease inclination.
    
    We will have to wait and see what happens, and observers should be prepared
    for the object to run late by at least several minutes, and off-track,
    relative the above elements.
    
    Below are the manoeuvres to-date:
    
                            Per  Apo   Inc
    Seg Burn  Date   UTC     km   km   deg   
      COLA   Aug 20         278 49989 22.10
     1    1  Aug 29 14:52   446 49975 21.62
     1    2  Aug 31 13:25   589 49992 21.21
     1    3  Sep 02 12:09   791 49983 20.81
     1    4  Sep 04 11:05   982 49981 20.36
     2    1  Sep 07 01:58  1146 49994 19.96
     2    2  Sep 08 09:33  1370 49958 19.69 approx, short obs arc
     2    3  Sep 10 09:07  1554 49985 19.20 approx, short obs arc
     2    4  Sep 11 00:50  2222 49975 18.24
    
    Times are approximate mid-point of lengthy burns near apogee.
    
    AEHF 1 r                                               227 X 50052 km
    1 36869U 10039B   10254.49260750  .00011948  00000-0  37686-2 0    08
    2 36869  21.5962 305.9109 7904307 190.1650 128.5219  1.55193730    00
    Arc 20100905.42-0912.11 WRMS resid 0.014 totl 0.010 xtrk
    
    Ted Molczan
    
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 13 2010 - 01:29:25 UTC