RE: FW: Shuttle water dump while attached to ISS

From: Randy John (rjohn@axarosenberg.com)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 13:08:14 PDT

Next message: Jonathan T Wojack: "Progress undocking/docking"

Previous message: Jonathan T Wojack: "Re: FW: Shuttle water dump while attached to ISS"
Maybe in reply to: MALEY, PAUL D. (JSC-DO) (USA): "FW: Shuttle water dump while attached to ISS"
Next in thread: Jonathan T Wojack: "Re: Shuttle water dump while attached to ISS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

No, it is:

"More mass per cross-sectional area, more decay time;
 less mass per cross-sectional area, less decay time".

ISS may be massive, but it is hollow.  Crunch that same mass down into a little ball (with smaller cross-section) and it will take longer to decay.

	Randy

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan T Wojack [mailto:tlj18@juno.com]
So, is the following "slogan" generally correct:

"More mass, more decay time; less mass, less decay time" ?

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Jonathan T Wojack: "Progress undocking/docking"
Previous message: Jonathan T Wojack: "Re: FW: Shuttle water dump while attached to ISS"
Maybe in reply to: MALEY, PAUL D. (JSC-DO) (USA): "FW: Shuttle water dump while attached to ISS"
Next in thread: Jonathan T Wojack: "Re: Shuttle water dump while attached to ISS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 13:08:32 PDT