Re: Starshine-2 not seen again

From: Tom Wagner (sciteach1950@home.com)
Date: Wed Dec 26 2001 - 17:36:03 EST

  • Next message: Julian Grammer: "Re: Sat ID software"

    > It is from the earth's magnetic field and the object does >not have to be
    magnetic, only able to conduct >electricity.
    ..............................
    The moving electrons themselves form a magnetic field.
    ..............................
    
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Sven Grahn" <svengrahn@mail.wineasy.se>
    To: "Jonathan T Wojack" <tlj18@juno.com>; <SeeSat-L@satobs.org>
    Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 3:59 PM
    Subject: Re: Starshine-2 not seen again
    
    
    > At 16:05 2001-12-26 -0500, Jonathan T Wojack wrote:
    > > > Not the atmosphere but the body of the satellite, Jonathon.
    > > > Any moving conductor in a magnetic field has induced currents
    > > > flowing in
    > > > it. Since most conductors have some resistance, there is energy lost
    > > > by heat. In the case of a spinning object this comes from the
    > > > rotational
    > > > energy.
    > >
    > >Yes, that makes sense.  Do you know what is the "major" magnetic material
    > >(in terms of quantity and magnetic field strength.  Aluminum is a common
    > >material used in building satellites, but it is only a paramagnetic
    > >material) for Starshine?
    > >
    > >When the typical satellite has its spin rate gradually reduced, is this
    > >primary from the atmosphere, or the Earth's magnetic field?
    >
    > It is from the earth's magnetic field and the object does not have to be
    > magnetic, only able to conduct electricity.
    >
    > Sven Grahn
    >
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
    http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 26 2001 - 17:42:06 EST