Mike McCants identified my unknown at 02:33:40 UTC Jan. 31 UTC (Jan. 30 local) as Cosmos 100 r. At the bottom is my reply to Mike. He gave these TLE's: Mir 1 16609U 86017A 98030.84487985 .00008585 00000-0 10263-3 0 2014 2 16609 51.6580 20.6008 0004851 324.2370 35.8315 15.61908057682579 Progress 1 25102U 97081A 98030.90893767 -.00001066 00000-0 -61003-5 0 399 2 25102 51.6595 20.2789 0004202 334.6655 25.4146 15.61592878 6506 STS-89 1 25143U 98003A 98030.91012446 -.00000119 00000-0 44399-5 0 281 2 25143 51.6386 20.2330 0017821 348.2086 32.7758 15.65924685 1213 Soyuz 1 25146U 98004A 98030.92783832 -.00001630 11357-4 34733-5 0 78 2 25146 51.6547 20.4091 0026680 124.7888 235.5611 16.00451947 206 Cosmos 100 r 3.8 2.6 0.0 5.1 v 1 01844U 65106B 98029.08972634 +.00006673 +00000-0 +15930-3 0 06453 2 01844 064.9723 042.0972 0020825 266.8591 093.0109 15.42189159756788 And wrote about Soyuz: << Apparently the Soyuz stays in a much lower orbit until "just the right time" and then performs the rendezvous within 1/2 orbit and then docks. They (with their limited batteries) don't have any incentive to "hang around" near Mir. >> And as to why nobody reported seeing Soyuz: << Because it was much later and much fainter. >> My reply to Mike: _____________________________________________ Hi Mike, Thanks for your reply. The unknown object that was the 2nd object after the Shuttle you identified to be Cosmos 100 r. I ran the prediction with STS Plus and yes, indeed, everything fit to my satisfaction. Cos100r culminated at 02:33:32 UTC Jan. 31 UTC (Friday night local) az. 116.4 elev. 56. I had written that it had culminated az. 135 elev. 65-75 at 02:33:40 UTC. The difference in az. & elev. is within my tolerance for error just going by memory but my time was just off by 8 sec. So, I'm convinced it was Cosmos 100 r. Thanks again. And thanks for confirming that the object closely trailing Mir was Progress M-37. Jake Rees Burbank, Calif. (34.164 N, 118.341 W)