Alan Pickup wrote: > However, I wonder if the anomaly around February 5.7 was due to the loss > of one or both (are there two?) of the Molniya's solar panels which must > be under considerable heating and dynamic strain at such a low perigee. > With its large area to mass ratio, a detached panel would re-enter > almost immediately, while its absence would decrease the effective area > to mass ratio of the remaining satellite. According to the picture in "Kosmonavtika - Enciklopediya", published in 1985 in Moscow, the Molniya-1 series of S/C have 6 wings of solar panels arranged in daisy-like form with 60 degrees between panels. Highly probably the arrangement is the same for Molnija-3 S/C. -- ---------------------------------------------------------- Antonin Vitek Office: Main Library - Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Narodni 3, CZ-115 22 Praha 1, Czech Republic Phone: +420(2)24 22 03 84 ext. 255 Home: +420(305)92 865 Fax: +420(2)24 24 06 11 E-mail:AVITEK@LIB.CAS.CZ IMPORTANT! NOTE CHANGE IN PHONE COUNTRY PREFIX!!!! Home: Kytin 127, CZ-525 10 p. Mnisek p.B., Czech Republic Phone: +420(305)92865 Coordinates: 14.2193 deg E, 49.8488 deg N, 442 m ASL ----------------------------------------------------------