Not only is my EORSAT page http://www.algonet.se/~b_gimle/eorsat.htm sadly outdated (june-97), but Russell's 'Cosmos satellite' posting made me realize my reply to 'Cosmos 1220' missed: Cosmos 2347 8.0 3.0 0.0 3.5 v 1 25088U 97079A 98036.22329439 -.00013285 +00000-0 -21453-3 0 01985 2 25088 065.0274 026.5222 0009682 260.8317 099.1745 15.51982085008995 in the plane 70 deg.W of: Cosmos 2335 6.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 v 1 24670U 96069A 98036.19622220 -.00003636 +00000-0 -55115-4 0 07178 2 24670 065.0383 314.1625 0010026 278.9015 081.0995 15.52000591065280 >is their sister satellite Cosmos 2335. All of these have their operational >orbit maintained, until the boosting jets are nearly depleted. They are >then partially de-orbited to allow natural atmospheric decay to occur. .... >Once we have the precise date, we can then consider till what date in 1999 the >next satellite in this series (25088,1997-79A,Cosmos2347,1997 Dec 9) is likely >to last. > --------------------------------------------------------------- -- bjorn@tt-tech.se (office) b_gimle@algonet.se (home) -- -- 59.2237N, 18.2286E, 44 m http://www.algonet.se/~b_gimle -- -- SeeSat-L / Visual Satellite Observer Home Page found at -- -- http://www.satellite.eu.org/satintro.html -- ---------------------------------------------------------------