Re: Fw: More Debris from ET?

From: Markus Mehring (m.m@gmx.de)
Date: Sat Feb 08 2003 - 00:11:08 EST

  • Next message: Don Ledger: "Re: Root Cause Analysis"

    On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:26:25 -0400, you (Don Ledger
    <dledger@ns.sympatico.ca>) wrote:
    
    >Hi Markus,
    >I either got that off CNN or a newspaper article sometime in the 
    >last two days-think yesterday.
    
    Gotta have been misreported then, I would say. I guess CNN is not the
    culprit, MilesO isn't known to mess up that badly on spaceflight topics.
    
    >Since I'm an older Canadian I 
    >remember converting the number from kilos to pounds. Came out 7 
    >or to be a bit more precise, 6.66 pounds.
    
    Well, since I'm a younger German I'm used to thinking metric, sorry if I'm
    messing up when thinking in imperial figures.
    
    >NASA was guesstimating its weight in any event.
    
    That's certainly true, but they were also guesstimating based on halfway
    decent size estimates, and for a piece of ET insulation to weigh 6-7
    pounds, it would have to be _a lot_ larger than what can be seen of the
    piece in the footage.
    
    
    CU!	Markus
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
    http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 00:29:13 EST