RE: DCB Obs 2/20/09

From: Ted Molczan (ssl3molcz@rogers.com)
Date: Sat Feb 21 2009 - 14:15:10 UTC

  • Next message: Greg Roberts: "RE: DCB Obs 2/20/09"

    Derek Breit responded to Greg Roberts:
    
    > Hey anything is possible.. I sent everything to Ted and You 
    > so you could check it out.
    
    Thank you, Derek. I have checked it out, and it still appears to be 1.96 s late.
    Greg also checked it, and found it at least 2 s late.
    
    > But I believe the answer is that this is why we observe because if the
    > elements were perfect we wouldn't have to??
    
    Agreed, but since the orbit is very stable, and the elements are nearly
    contemporaneous with your observation, I expect time agreement to within a small
    fraction of 1 s, so something appears to be amiss. To help resolve the matter, I
    recommend that a few additional observations be made by yourself and other
    positional observers. If all observers find it ~2 s late, then the elements are
    at fault; if only your obs are late, then your timing is at fault. In either
    case, we will learn something new.
    
    Ted Molczan
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
    http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 21 2009 - 14:16:34 UTC