Re: Hotbird 10

From: T V I (tvinvestigations@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 25 2009 - 09:34:15 UTC

Next message: T V I: "Re: Geo sat's to internal power = time for them to go into shadow"

Previous message: Bjoern Gimle@GlocalNet: "Re: Geo sat's to internal power = time for them to go into shadow"
In reply to: Chris Peat: "Hotbird 10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Chris

Thanks for the reply.
We have been watching the transponders winding up an down for a couple of days now.

I presume SpaceTrack will eventually correct the mix up.


Thanks again

John





--- On Wed, 25/2/09, Chris Peat <chris.peat@dlr.de> wrote:

> From: Chris Peat <chris.peat@dlr.de>
> Subject: Hotbird 10
> To: SeeSat-L@satobs.org
> Date: Wednesday, 25 February, 2009, 9:11 AM
> Hi all,
> Object B (33750) is definitely Hotbird 10. I just got back
> from supporting
> the Hotbird 10 commissioning phase at the Eutelsat control
> centre near
> Paris. It is currently stationed at around 4 degrees east
> for commissioning.
> 
> Chris Peat
> Heavens-Above.com



      

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: T V I: "Re: Geo sat's to internal power = time for them to go into shadow"
Previous message: Bjoern Gimle@GlocalNet: "Re: Geo sat's to internal power = time for them to go into shadow"
In reply to: Chris Peat: "Hotbird 10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 25 2009 - 09:35:08 UTC