NEAR Earth Swingby News 1. First 1998 optical sighting of NEAR shows it 2 mags. fainter. 2. Request for timings of NEAR's Sunglints; best chance in southern U.S.A.; panel misalignments can cause significant path errors. 3. Request for astrometric observations from Southern Hemisphere observatories soon after the Jan. 23rd flyby. 4. JPL Web site for accurate topocentric positions. These topics are described in more detail below: -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. The first optical observation of NEAR reported to me was made by Alain Murray at the Observatoire de la Cote d'Azur at Caussols, France, at U.T. 1998 Jan. 21, 18h 27m 46s. NEAR was 19th mag., two magnitudes fainter than the prediction I distributed yesterday, and was within a few tenths of an arc second (the error of the GSC star positions used for the reference frame) of the precision topocentric ephemeris computed at JPL's ephemeris generation Web site at http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/eph Alain took several more images that he plans to make into a gif- format movie showing NEAR's motion that we hope to be able to put on NEAR's Web site later today. Probably by then there will be observations from some other observatories. Important information about using the JPL site is given in item 4. -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Timed observations of tomorrow night's NEAR Sunglints are requested by those who can make them. Unfortunately, the weather forecast is poor for most of the Sunglint regions, including overcast everywhere east of the Mississippi River except southern Florida and the West Coast north of central California. The weather forecast is currently best for southern California, and Arizona and New Mexico. Most of Texas should also be clear at the time, but clouds from a retreating front may still cover the southeastern part of Texas, including Houston (so observers there who want to see the glint should be prepared to travel west). Partly cloudy skies are expected in Utah and Colorado, so the glint might be seen there, but conditions deteriorate east of Colorado, with Kansas City expected to be mostly cloudy. Approximately the southern third of the Florida peninsula should be mostly clear, with clouds increasing towards the north to overcast in Georgia and the Florida panhandle. Check your local forecast, since the situation could change. To time the Sunglints, use a tape recorder to record WWV shortwave time signals and you calls when the Sunglint appears and disappears, and any step increases or decreases in brightness. If you have a camcorder, try to record the Sunglint with it, but only if you can see at least Mirphak and Algol in the viewfinder; you will need to use manual focus rather than the camcorder's autofocus to record stars (first, try to record Sirius, then Capella, then whatever stars of Perseus you can record). Record WWV time signals at 5 or 10 megahertz for timing. If you don't have a WWV receiver, record the event like IOTA has requested for recent occultations of Aldebaran: Record CNN Headline News before and after the event, leaving the camcorder running the whole time (a few IOTA members will make a master tape of CNN and WWV to calibrate the tapes that use only CNN for timing). If you have neither a WWV receiver nor cable TV, then record, also before and after the Sunglint, the U. S. Naval Observatory master clock by telephoning 1-900-410-8463 (it has a 50 cent toll), preferably via AT&T to ensure use of land lines. Unfortunately, some telephone companies will not allow use of AT&T for placing calls to 900 numbers. Keep in mind that the misalignment of the solar panels can cause a significant shift of the Sunglint path shown in the maps on the NEAR and IOTA Web sites, so observers at least a full path-width away should watch for a possible Sunglint. The Sun's diameter is 0.5 degree, and the misalignments can be as much as a full degree (two path-widths), although I suspect they will be only a few tenths, or less than a path width, off. Also, I have found errors in the plotted locations of the Sunglint ellipses on the maps; all of them east of the Rocky Mountains should be shifted about a deg. of longitude towards the east (the ones west of the Rockies are shown in their correct locations). Hence, all of Massachusetts and the whole Florida peninsula are within the predicted Sunglint path. We will analyze only a few tapes for measuring the misalignment of NEAR's solar panels; we don't need dozens of tapes. So you should send a brief description of what you recorded to me first by e-mail, and only send the tape if we request it. Since most areas will be clouded out, your tape could be valuable. Short glints that might be seen from locations near or outside the edges of the predicted path would be most valuable for defining the solar panel misalignments, and negative observations can also be useful. I generated the pointing vectors for the Sunglint sequence, but Gene Heyler fine-tuned them with my help, developed the spacecraft pointing commands and simulated what the spacecraft would really do in response to the commands (the glint path does not bend as sharply as shown on the map, but "rounds" the corners slightly). Gene generated the Sunglint annimation that is on the NEAR Web site using the Satellite Tool Kit software. A little history of the Sunglints was published in yesterday's San Francisco Chronicle and might be seen on their Web site at http://www.sfgate.com. -------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Astrometrists in the Southern Hemisphere are encouraged to obtain astrometric observations of NEAR as soon as possible after the Earth flyby, before the distance becomes very large. Observations relative to ACT and HIP-catalog stars may be needed, that is, hopefully one or more stars from these catalogs will be in the CCD frame. The observations could be of value to define NEAR's precise departure direction, important information for designing the first post-flyby trajectory correction maneuver for reaching Eros. The usual radiometric tracking that is already scheduled will probably be good enough for this purpose, but for over two months after the flyby, NEAR can only be tracked from the Deep Space Network (DSN) station in Canberra, the first time an interplanetary spacecraft has been in such a situation, trackable from only one station, so the real errors could be larger than the expected ones. -------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. The JPL ephemeris Web site given in item 1 is a little more difficult to use than the one at the Minor Planet Center (MPC) site given in yesterday's message, and is most important for very small imaging systems where the errors of just under 1 arc minute common to the MPC and my topocentric predictions are important. It has flexibility in using a specifed time interval and increment. The JPL site "requires a table-capable browser". When you click on the object for which an ephemeris is desired, you need to click on the box to the right to expand it, then select the NEAR flyby at the bottom of that menu. Then, you must click on the "Sun/Planet/Spacecraft" button on the left to "lock" NEAR as the selected object; otherwise, it will automatically revert to Mars when you back out of that submenu. When you go to the other submenus, you simply need to click on the "use requested .." button at the bottom to lock them into place. The JPL ephemeris is full-precision. The MPC and my predictions use the same precision spacecraft trajectory from JPL, but at least my predictions neglect the small change in the observer's position due to the 2 years of precession from 1998 to 2000, light-time effects and some other small effects. Even so, the under 1' error that results will not be important for most observers. Note that the azimuths given in the MPC predictions are counted from 0 being due south rather than 0 being due north. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Later today, I hope to produce some star charts, showing the topocentric paths for several locations during the few hours before the Sunglint maneuvers, that can be placed on the NEAR and IOTA Web sites. I will probably make only one more mass mailing like this before the flyby, probably around 1h or 2h UT Jan. 23 UT, mainly to describe what topocentric star charts might be available. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Below is the ephemeris I distributed yesterday, but with magnitudes revised using Alain Murray's observations earlier tonight. Only the date, time, and mag. are given to try to limit the size of this message. During the Sunglint times (6:23 to 6:50 U.T.) for North American observers, NEAR's unglinted magnitude will probably be a little brighter, maybe half a mag. or more, due to the smaller phase angle. Similarly, the mags. after the 7:23 U.T. perigee are probably too optimistic by a magnitude or more due to the unfavorable departure phase angle. 1998 Jan. UTC NEAR Day h m Mag. 21 12:00 19.3 22 0:00 18.7 22 12:00 17.6 22 18:00 16.9 22 20:00 16.5 23 0:00 15.6 23 2:00 14.9 23 3:00 14.5 23 4:00 14.0 23 5:00 13.2 23 5:30 12.7 23 6:00 12.0 23 6:10 11.8 23 6:20 11.4 23 6:30 11.0 23 6:40 10.5 23 6:50 9.9 23 7:00 8.9 23 7:40 8.9 23 7:50 10.1 23 8:00 10.8 23 8:30 12.1 23 9:00 12.9 23 10:00 13.9 23 12:00 15.1 23 15:00 16.1 23 18:00 16.8 24 0:00 17.7 David W. Dunham, NEAR Mission Design, 1998 Jan. 22, 7h U.T.