RE: Shuttle landing path

From: Paul Grace (paulgrace@lookoutranch.com)
Date: Thu Jul 21 2011 - 22:57:53 UTC

  • Next message: Woodchuk: "Re: Shuttle landing path"

    A clear boom--boom.  I set the alarm, hoping to see it pass.  It was louder
    than I expected.
    
      _____  
    
    From: tony dinkel [mailto:tonydinkel47@hotmail.com] 
    Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 14:47
    To: paulgrace@lookoutranch.com; direland@drdale.com;
    roger.in.eugene@gmail.com
    Cc: seesat-l@satobs.org
    Subject: RE: Shuttle landing path
    
    
    Yes, I remember that ground track very clearly because I wanted to head
    north with the boy and try to see it.  I think I also remember one that came
    darn near down the middle of the SJV to EDW.
     
    And when you say you heard it, was it a crackle, sizzle, boom or RF?
     
    td
     
    
    > From: paulgrace@lookoutranch.com
    > To: direland@drdale.com; roger.in.eugene@gmail.com
    > Subject: RE: Shuttle landing path
    > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:58:55 -0700
    > CC: seesat-l@satobs.org
    > 
    > Columbia passed over Point Arena, California (I live here and heard
    it--damn
    > the cloud cover!) and burned up over Texas. It would seem it was
    > descending.
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: seesat-l-bounces+paulgrace=lookoutranch.com@satobs.org
    > [mailto:seesat-l-bounces+paulgrace=lookoutranch.com@satobs.org] On Behalf
    Of
    > Dale Ireland
    > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 11:22
    > To: 'Roger'
    > Cc: 'SeeSat-L'
    > Subject: RE: Shuttle landing path
    > 
    > Gong! The policy was in effect for years before that. Also the Columbia
    WAS
    > ascending but it wasn't in a high inclination orbit .
    > 
    > Dale
    > 
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Roger [mailto:roger.in.eugene@gmail.com] 
    > > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 11:10 AM
    > > To: Dale Ireland
    > > Cc: SeeSat-L
    > > Subject: Re: Shuttle landing path
    > > 
    > > I think after Columbia, they tried to avoid flying over the 
    > > US on re-entry.
    > > 
    > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Dale Ireland 
    > > <direland@drdale.com> wrote:
    > > > Why did the shuttle almost always land on the ascending leg of its 
    > > > orbit rather than the descending which gives the whole 
    > > country a great view?
    > > >
    > > > Dale
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > _______________________________________________
    > > > Seesat-l mailing list
    > > > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    > > >
    > > 
    > > 
    > > 
    > > --
    > > 
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Seesat-l mailing list
    > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Seesat-l mailing list
    > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/private/seesat-l/attachments/20110721/ca52e793/attachment.html 
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 21 2011 - 23:28:55 UTC