Ted points out that my observations of last night that I thought were MiTex 2 may have been AMC-11 (GE-11) 04017A / 28252, due to magnitude. I can't dispel this; perhaps another night I can check back and set this to rest. Meanwhile the following should probably be ditched:
> > 29241 06 024B 8335 G 20090619083738630 57 25 1726080-053553 67 S
> > 29241 06 024B 8335 G 20090619083833900 57 25 1727139-053589 87 S
> > 29241 06 024B 8335 G 20090619084326840 57 25 1731917-053528 67 S
> > 29241 06 024B 8335 G 20090619084439480 57 25 1733065-053542 67 S
> > 29241 06 024B 8335 G 20090619084928960 57 25 1737953-053695 97 S
> > 29241 06 024B 8335 G 20090619085015360 57 25 1738709-053610 47 S
> > 29241 06 024B 8335 G 20090619085037260 57 25 1739074-053609 37 S
> > 29241 06 024B 8335 G 20090619085301400 57 25 1741437-053524 87 S
This stinks, because seeing MiTex was a highlight for me last night. I really hope I am able to see it, although if it is only 14th mag the hopes of seeing it visually are low.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 20 2009 - 02:28:01 UTC