Thanks for your quick and valuable reply Rob. I have narrowed down to about five candidates reentering around those dates. Cheers. Ruben El mié, 14 may 2025 a las 2:43, <robmcnaught_at_westnet.com.au> escribió: > Hi all, > The direction of motion of a satellite relative to a geographic parallel > is dependent on the latitude of the location. For example, for an orbital > inclination of 12.0deg, a satellite cannot pass overhead at a geocentric > latitude greater than 12.0deg N or 12.0degS and would be moving due east > (Az=90deg) at the north and south apex. It would only have an angle of + or > - 12.0 deg when crossing the equator. > > The geographical/geodetic latitude of Armstrong/Bustinza is ~32.76S which > represents a geocentric latitude of 32.59S. For an azimuth of 78.56deg at > this geocentric latitude, the implied orbital inclination is 34.3deg. Hope > this helps in narrowing down the candidates. > > Cheers, Rob > > > > > On Wed May 14 2025 ruben lianza via Seesat-l < > seesat-l_at_lists.seesatmail.org> wrote: > ---------- Original Message ---------- > > Dear Ted, Marco and Sat Obs members: > I have been working all last weekend in the recovery and investigation of > provenance of three high pressure cylinders that have fallen near the > cities of Armstrong and Bustinza, Province of Santa Fe, Argentina. > > Their crash sites are remarkably aligned in a straight line, within a 12 > miles long x 90 yards wide corridor, heading 78.56 °. The angle of the > corridor respect to the nearest parallel is about 12° which I assume is > coincident with its orbital inclination. > > > _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list https://lists.seesatmail.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-lReceived on Wed May 14 2025 - 05:12:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 14 2025 - 12:12:16 UTC