Re: NOSS

From: Russell Eberst (eberst@cableinet.co.uk)
Date: Sun Oct 14 2001 - 06:46:18 EDT

Next message: Ted Molczan: "Updated 01040C elements"

Previous message: Bjoern Gimle: "Re: More GEO questions"
In reply to: JAY RESPLER: "Re: NOSS"
Next in thread: TLN: "NOSS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 01:27 13/10/01 -0400, Jay Respler wrote:
>Wasn't info on these items was being withheld for now?
The reason was that the fleet of Afghani submarines might submerge
and avoid detection each time that a triplet of NOSS satellites was
scheduled to pass overhead. The surface fleet would simply maintain
radio silence.


Best wishes,                     Total observations:
Russell  Eberst
55.9486N,   3.1383W,  150 feet = 46 metres above MSL

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Ted Molczan: "Updated 01040C elements"
Previous message: Bjoern Gimle: "Re: More GEO questions"
In reply to: JAY RESPLER: "Re: NOSS"
Next in thread: TLN: "NOSS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 09:22:22 EDT