Re: How Columbia was imaged

From: Tom Wagner (sciteach@mchsi.com)
Date: Wed Oct 06 2004 - 21:33:30 EDT

Next message: Tom Wagner: "Re: videotaped -8 flare in twilight"

Previous message: Bram Dorreman: "Does FSW 3, 04-033 A, 28042 really flash?"
In reply to: Allen Thomson: "How Columbia was imaged"
Next in thread: Björn Gimle: "Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Reply: Björn Gimle: "Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

When I use "wall-eyed (stereo) vision" while looking at pairs of the top
images taken in visible-light I see a very 3D view of the shuttle.

Thanks for the info Allen.

Tom  Iowa  USA
+   +  +

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Allen Thomson" <thomsona@flash.net>
To: <SeeSat-L@satobs.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 11:40 AM
Subject: How Columbia was imaged


> A note explaining a bit about how the high-resolution visual and IR images
of Columbia were obtained from Maui:
http://www.afrlhorizons.com/Briefs/Feb04/DE0303.html .

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Tom Wagner: "Re: videotaped -8 flare in twilight"
Previous message: Bram Dorreman: "Does FSW 3, 04-033 A, 28042 really flash?"
In reply to: Allen Thomson: "How Columbia was imaged"
Next in thread: Björn Gimle: "Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Reply: Björn Gimle: "Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 06 2004 - 21:37:35 EDT