Re: Re: How Columbia was imaged

From: b_gimle@algonet.se
Date: Sat Oct 09 2004 - 14:23:56 EDT

Next message: Leo Barhorst: "Obs LB 2004-10-09"

Previous message: Björn Gimle: "Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Maybe in reply to: Björn Gimle: "Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Next in thread: Björn Gimle: "Re: Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Reply: Björn Gimle: "Re: Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

The visible light triple is named www.algonet.se/~b_gimle/gif/DE0303G1b.
gif
>----Original message----
>www.algonet.se/~b_gimle/gif/DE0303G2a.gif
>www.algonet.se/~b_gimle/gif/DE0303G1B.gif
>
>OT: I also have 3D pictures taken from an aircraft

These are out-of-focus, because the camera was on autofocus instead of manual 
infinity and probably affected by the aircraft window.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Leo Barhorst: "Obs LB 2004-10-09"
Previous message: Björn Gimle: "Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Maybe in reply to: Björn Gimle: "Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Next in thread: Björn Gimle: "Re: Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Reply: Björn Gimle: "Re: Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 09 2004 - 14:26:06 EDT