Re: Sat track photo

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Ron Lee: "Globalstar and Echostar-5"
• Previous message: rkresken@esoc.esa.de: "Re: M42 "sat photo""
• Maybe in reply to: nixj@bellsouth.net: "Sat track photo"
• Next in thread: Randy John: "Re: Sat track photo"

Hi,

Very bad scan. But for me forget diffraction: the are no major stars on trails,
and the trails are very too long for optical systems.

I suggest planes. Or One plane and 2 satellites.

Raoul

-----

http://obswww.unige.ch/~behrend
"Herbe à Nicot? Herbe à nigaud!"


On 22-Sep-99 at 23:57, nixj@bellsouth.net (nixj@bellsouth.net) wrote:
> Jay mentioned that he would post the photo when he found the time, I had
> some time so it's at
> 
>    http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Galaxy/3070/M42UnIds.htm 
> 
> along with the details, time, Lat/Long etc.
> 
> Personally I lean toward a diffraction ray pattern, and am having trouble
> getting skymap to plot an alldat search using al990301 or al990308 there
> seems to be a line missing in each tle.   
> 
> Jim
> 

• Next message: Ron Lee: "Globalstar and Echostar-5"
• Previous message: rkresken@esoc.esa.de: "Re: M42 "sat photo""
• Maybe in reply to: nixj@bellsouth.net: "Sat track photo"
• Next in thread: Randy John: "Re: Sat track photo"